Arvind Kejriwal will remain the Chief Minister of Delhi, but his wife, Sunita Kejriwal, is likely to assume a “significant role” in the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) in the coming days, party sources told news agency PTI on Sunday.
The news about Sunita Kejriwal potentially assuming a significant role in the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) suggests a potential shift in the party’s dynamics and leadership structure. Arvind Kejriwal, the current Chief Minister of Delhi, has been a prominent figure in Indian politics, known for his anti-corruption stance and advocacy for common citizens’ rights.
His wife, Sunita Kejriwal, has maintained a relatively low profile in comparison but her involvement in the AAP could signal a broader strategy or a desire for increased participation of family members within the party.
The AAP, founded in 2012, emerged as a significant player in Indian politics, particularly in the National Capital Territory of Delhi, where it secured a landslide victory in the 2015 Delhi Legislative Assembly elections. Arvind Kejriwal’s leadership has been instrumental in the party’s rise, focusing on issues such as clean governance, anti-corruption measures, and welfare policies aimed at improving the lives of common citizens.
The potential involvement of Sunita Kejriwal in the AAP could bring both opportunities and challenges for the party. On one hand, it could provide additional support and leadership within the party, potentially broadening its appeal and strengthening its organizational structure. Sunita Kejriwal’s participation could also help in mobilizing support among certain demographics or communities.
However, it’s important to note that family members assuming significant roles within political parties can sometimes raise concerns about nepotism or dynastic politics. Critics may question whether Sunita Kejriwal’s involvement is based on merit or merely a result of her marital relationship with Arvind Kejriwal. Transparency and accountability within the AAP would be crucial in addressing any such concerns and ensuring that leadership positions are earned through competence and dedication to the party’s principles.
Overall, the potential for Sunita Kejriwal to assume a significant role in the AAP reflects the evolving dynamics of Indian politics and the strategies adopted by political parties to strengthen their positions. As the situation develops, it will be interesting to observe the impact of her involvement on the party’s trajectory and its ability to connect with voters in Delhi and beyond.
The arrest of Arvind Kejriwal, the Chief Minister of Delhi, on March 21 in connection with a money laundering case linked to the Delhi excise policy, sparked significant controversy and drew widespread attention. His wife, Sunita Kejriwal, has been actively involved in protesting against his arrest, emerging as a prominent figure in the opposition’s efforts to challenge the legal actions taken against her husband.
Arvind Kejriwal’s arrest in connection with the alleged money laundering case sent shockwaves through the political landscape of Delhi and beyond. As the head of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and a prominent figure in Indian politics, his detention raised questions about the motives behind the legal action and the potential implications for the AAP’s image and electoral prospects.
Sunita Kejriwal’s role in the protests against her husband’s arrest underscores the personal and political significance of the situation. As the spouse of a high-profile politician, she has chosen to actively participate in the opposition’s efforts to challenge the legal proceedings against Arvind Kejriwal.
Her involvement adds a personal dimension to the broader political narrative surrounding the case, highlighting the impact of legal actions on the families of accused individuals.
The circumstances surrounding Arvind Kejriwal’s arrest are complex and have generated intense debate and speculation. The allegations of money laundering linked to the Delhi excise policy raise serious concerns about corruption and malfeasance within the government. However, they also raise questions about the fairness and impartiality of the legal process, particularly given the political context in which the case has unfolded.
The arrest of a sitting Chief Minister is a rare and significant event in Indian politics, amplifying the scrutiny and attention placed on the case. It has led to calls for transparency, accountability, and due process in the handling of the allegations against Arvind Kejriwal and other implicated individuals.
The outcome of the legal proceedings will have far-reaching implications not only for the individuals directly involved but also for the broader political landscape of Delhi and the AAP’s future trajectory.\
In the meantime, Sunita Kejriwal’s active involvement in the protests against her husband’s arrest serves as a reminder of the personal toll that political controversies can take on individuals and their families. It also highlights the resilience and determination of those who stand by their loved ones in the face of adversity, regardless of the political consequences.
As the case continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how the legal proceedings will impact Arvind Kejriwal’s political career, the AAP’s electoral prospects, and the broader dynamics of Indian politics. However, one thing is clear: the arrest of a Chief Minister and the subsequent protests led by his wife have thrust these issues into the spotlight, sparking a national conversation about justice, accountability, and the rule of law.
Sunita Kejriwal’s attendance at the “Loktantra Bachao” rally on March 31 marked her political debut, as reported by PTI. The rally, organized by the INDIA bloc, took place at the Ramlila ground and served as a platform for various political leaders and activists to voice their concerns about the state of democracy in India.
During her speech at the rally, Sunita Kejriwal lauded her husband, Arvind Kejriwal, referring to him as a “lion” who “lives in the hearts of millions of people.” This characterization reflects the admiration and support she has for her husband, despite the legal challenges he is facing.
Additionally, Sunita Kejriwal took the opportunity to read out a message penned by Arvind Kejriwal from his custody under the Enforcement Directorate (ED). This gesture not only highlights her active involvement in supporting her husband but also underscores the emotional and personal dimension of the situation.
By sharing Arvind Kejriwal’s message with the audience at the rally, Sunita Kejriwal aimed to convey his thoughts and sentiments to the public, further solidifying their bond and demonstrating solidarity amidst challenging circumstances.
Sunita Kejriwal’s participation in the “Loktantra Bachao” rally and her vocal support for Arvind Kejriwal indicate her willingness to engage in political activism and advocacy, particularly in defense of democratic principles and individual rights.
Her presence at the rally signifies a new chapter in her involvement in public affairs, potentially paving the way for a more active role within the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) or the broader political arena.
Overall, Sunita Kejriwal’s debut at the “Loktantra Bachao” rally underscores the intertwined nature of personal and political dynamics in the context of Arvind Kejriwal’s legal troubles and the broader political landscape in India.
Her public support for her husband and her willingness to engage in political activism reflect the complexities and challenges faced by individuals and families involved in the political sphere. As the situation continues to unfold, Sunita Kejriwal’s role and contributions are likely to evolve, shaping the narrative surrounding Arvind Kejriwal’s arrest and its implications for the AAP and Indian politics as a whole.
Sunita Kejriwal’s criticism of the Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led central government for keeping her husband, Arvind Kejriwal, in jail despite the court not finding him guilty, reflects the tensions and controversies surrounding his arrest and detention.
Her remarks underscore the broader political context in which the legal proceedings against Arvind Kejriwal are taking place, as well as the ongoing power struggles between different political factions in India.
The decision to arrest and detain Arvind Kejriwal in connection with the alleged money laundering case linked to the Delhi excise policy has sparked significant debate and speculation. Critics of the central government have accused it of using legal mechanisms to target political opponents and stifle dissent, while supporters of the government argue that the actions taken are necessary to uphold the rule of law and combat corruption.
Sunita Kejriwal’s assertion that the court has not found Arvind Kejriwal guilty implies that she believes his detention is unjustified and politically motivated. By criticizing the central government’s decision to keep him in jail despite the lack of a guilty verdict, she is drawing attention to what she perceives as an infringement on her husband’s rights and a violation of due process.
The involvement of high-profile individuals like Arvind Kejriwal in legal controversies often takes on a symbolic significance beyond the specifics of the case itself. In this instance, his arrest and detention have become emblematic of broader issues related to democracy, governance, and the rule of law in India.
Sunita Kejriwal’s criticism of the central government also reflects the ongoing political rivalry between the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), led by Arvind Kejriwal, and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The AAP has positioned itself as a vocal critic of the Modi government, particularly on issues related to corruption, governance, and social justice.
Overall, Sunita Kejriwal’s condemnation of the central government’s actions underscores the contentious nature of Arvind Kejriwal’s arrest and the broader political dynamics at play in India. As the legal proceedings unfold and the political landscape continues to evolve, it remains to be seen how these tensions will be resolved and what implications they will have for Indian democracy and governance.
“The ED’s investigation has concluded, and the court hasn’t called him guilty so why have they kept him in jail? Their aim is only to keep him in jail during the Lok Sabha elections,” Sunita Kejriwal said.
Sunita Kejriwal’s statement highlights her frustration and concern regarding the detention of her husband, Arvind Kejriwal, in the context of the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) investigation and the absence of a guilty verdict from the court. Her remarks suggest that she believes Arvind Kejriwal’s continued incarceration is unjustified and politically motivated, particularly in the lead-up to the Lok Sabha elections.
The Enforcement Directorate, a law enforcement agency responsible for enforcing economic laws and fighting economic crime in India, conducted an investigation into allegations of money laundering linked to the Delhi excise policy.
However, Sunita Kejriwal asserts that the ED’s investigation has concluded without any finding of guilt on the part of her husband. This implies that, in her view, there is insufficient evidence to justify Arvind Kejriwal’s detention.
Furthermore, Sunita Kejriwal questions the motives behind her husband’s continued detention, particularly in the context of the Lok Sabha elections. Her assertion that the aim of keeping him in jail is to influence the electoral process underscores her belief that his arrest is politically motivated.
This suggests a perception of selective targeting or harassment by the authorities, potentially aimed at undermining Arvind Kejriwal’s political standing or disrupting the activities of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) during the election period.
The timing of Arvind Kejriwal’s detention in relation to the Lok Sabha elections adds a layer of complexity to the situation. Elections in India are highly competitive and politically charged events, with parties vying for power and influence. Sunita Kejriwal’s suggestion that her husband’s detention is part of a broader strategy to impact the electoral outcome reflects the heightened political tensions and rivalries that often accompany election campaigns.
Overall, Sunita Kejriwal’s statement underscores the broader controversies and debates surrounding her husband’s arrest and the perceived politicization of legal processes in India. As the situation continues to unfold, the motivations behind Arvind Kejriwal’s detention and its implications for Indian democracy and governance will remain subject to scrutiny and debate.
Union Minister and BJP leader Hardeep Singh Puri on Monday said that a “Rabri Devi is in the making” in an apparent reference to Sunita Kejriwal. “I have already said three-four times in the past seven-10 days that ‘Rabri Devi’ will come forward now. I mean to say that Sunita Kejriwal will come forward now…,” Puri said.
Anurag Thakur’s comparison of Sunita Kejriwal to Rabri Devi and his remarks about her potentially assuming the chief minister’s chair reflect the political rhetoric and dynamics surrounding the arrest of Arvind Kejriwal and the broader context of political competition in India.
Thakur’s comments, made to news agency ANI, drew attention to the perceived parallels between Sunita Kejriwal and Rabri Devi, the wife of former Bihar Chief Minister Lalu Prasad Yadav, suggesting that Sunita Kejriwal may follow a similar trajectory in terms of her involvement in politics.
Rabri Devi’s political career is notable for her assumption of the chief minister’s role in Bihar following her husband’s resignation due to corruption charges. Thakur’s comparison implies that he sees Sunita Kejriwal potentially following a similar path, wherein she takes on a more active and influential role within the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) or Delhi’s political landscape in response to her husband’s legal troubles.
Thakur’s remarks are significant in the context of the ongoing political rivalry between the Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP), led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and the AAP, led by Arvind Kejriwal. The BJP has been a vocal critic of the AAP and Arvind Kejriwal, particularly on issues related to governance, corruption, and law and order.
Thakur’s comparison of Sunita Kejriwal to Rabri Devi can be seen as part of the BJP’s broader strategy to discredit the AAP leadership and undermine their credibility.
The comparison also underscores the gendered nature of political discourse in India, wherein the actions and aspirations of female relatives of male politicians are often scrutinized and politicized. By likening Sunita Kejriwal to Rabri Devi, Thakur may be seeking to diminish her agency and contributions, framing her involvement in politics as derivative of her husband’s position rather than her own merits or aspirations.
However, it’s important to note that such comparisons can be reductive and overlook the unique circumstances and motivations of individuals involved. Sunita Kejriwal’s involvement in political activism and advocacy, particularly in defense of her husband, should be understood within the context of her own agency and convictions.
Overall, Thakur’s comparison of Sunita Kejriwal to Rabri Devi and his remarks about her potentially assuming the chief minister’s chair reflect the complex dynamics of Indian politics, where personal relationships and family ties intersect with broader political ambitions and rivalries. As the situation continues to unfold, the implications of such rhetoric for the AAP, the BJP, and Indian democracy as a whole will be subject to further analysis and debate.
Rabri Devi is and wife of RJD supremo Lalu Prasad Yadav. Speaking to PTI, senior advocate Ajit Sinha said when Lalu Yadav was sent to jail, he was initially of the view that the government could be run from the jail. However, later he made his spouse Rabri Devi his successor.
Kejriwal is the fourth top AAP leader who has been lodged in the Tihar Jail in connection with the excise policy case. Earlier, former deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia, ex-health minister Satyendra Jain and Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh were sent to jail for their alleged involvement in the “scam”.
BJP leader Sudhanshu Trivedi said Lalu Prasad Yadav has become Arvind Kejriwal’s guru.After a Delhi court sent chief minister Arvind Kejriwal to jail till April 15, his wife Sunita Kejriwal attacked the BJP-led central government, saying they want to keep the AAP chief in jail because of the Lok Sabha elections. She said the people of the country will answer to “this dictatorship”.
Sunita Kejriwal’s response to the Delhi court’s decision to send her husband, Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, to jail until April 15 reflects the deep-seated tensions and political dynamics in India, particularly between the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) led by Arvind Kejriwal and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led central government. Her remarks underscore the perceived politicization of legal processes and the broader implications of such actions for Indian democracy.
By alleging that the BJP-led central government aims to keep Arvind Kejriwal in jail because of the upcoming Lok Sabha elections, Sunita Kejriwal is accusing the government of using legal mechanisms for political gain. This assertion suggests a belief that her husband’s detention is not solely based on legal merits but rather motivated by a desire to weaken the AAP and its electoral prospects.
Furthermore, Sunita Kejriwal’s characterization of the situation as a form of “dictatorship” implies a broader critique of the central government’s approach to governance and democracy. The term “dictatorship” carries connotations of authoritarianism and abuse of power, suggesting that she views the government’s actions as undemocratic and oppressive.
Sunita Kejriwal’s remarks also signal a call to action for the people of India, urging them to hold the government accountable for what she perceives as unjust and politically motivated actions. By invoking the “people of the country,” she is appealing to the broader public to resist what she sees as authoritarian tendencies and to demand transparency, fairness, and accountability from their elected leaders.
The timing of Arvind Kejriwal’s detention in relation to the Lok Sabha elections adds a layer of complexity to the situation. Elections in India are highly contested and politically charged events, with parties vying for power and influence. Sunita Kejriwal’s suggestion that her husband’s detention is politically motivated reflects the heightened stakes and rivalries that often accompany election campaigns.
Overall, Sunita Kejriwal’s response to her husband’s detention highlights the contentious nature of Indian politics and the ongoing struggles for power, legitimacy, and democratic governance. As the situation continues to unfold, the implications of Arvind Kejriwal’s detention and Sunita Kejriwal’s criticisms for Indian democracy and governance will remain subject to scrutiny and debate.
“Why has he been sent to jail? They have only one goal — to put him in jail during the Lok Sabha elections. The people of the country will answer to this dictatorship,” Sunita Kejriwal said after the hearing.
BJP leader and union minister Hardeep Singh Puri, meanwhile, compared with Rabri Devi, the wife of Lalu Yadav, who became the chief minister of Bihar when her husband was jailed in connection with a corruption case. “A Rabri Devi is in the making. I have already said 3-4 times in the past 7-10 days that ‘Rabri Devi’ will come forward. I mean to say that Sunita Kejriwal will come forward now,” Puri said.
“Can any government run from behind the bars? Here is a government which has three ministers already behind bars. They have a quorum, they can have cabinet meetings behind bars,” he said. BJP leader Bansuri Swaraj said the court believes Kejriwal should remain behind bars.
“We all saw a flop show of corruption during the INDIA bloc’s rally at Delhi’s Ramlila Maidan yesterday. What they did yesterday doesn’t fit the definition of ‘rally’. Rally means a huge public meeting; however, you will see empty chairs in the video. This means the public isn’t with them,” she said. BJP leader Sudhanshu Trivedi said Lalu Prasad Yadav has become Arvind Kejriwal’s guru.
“Those who tried to portray the bogie of victimhood, I would like to underline that today’s judgement of the court is based on concrete evidence for which neither we nor you or anybody else is privy. So, it is the jurisprudence which has decided to extend this judicial custody for 15 days. Now, it raises certain moral and constitutional questions…Anna Hazare used to be his (Arvind Kejriwal) ‘Guru’..
The Guru had said that he wouldn’t join politics, ‘Chela’ joined politics and became the CM too. But there was another rally yesterday where he changed his ‘Guru’. Now, the ‘Guru’ is Lalu Prasad Yadav…Lalu Yadav at least resigned from his post when he was going to jail but he (Arvind Kejriwal) hasn’t resigned yet,” he said.
The court has directed the Tihar Jail authorities to allow Arvind Kejriwal to carry medicines and books. The court also asked authorities to provide one table and chair, a religious locket and a special diet as prescribed by the doctors, as per the jail manual.
Arvind Kejriwal had demanded several books, including Bhagwat Geeta, Ramayan and a book titled “How Prime Minister Decided”.
Arvind Kejriwal was arrested by the Enforcement Directorate last month in connection with the liquor policy case. AAP claims he was arrested to prevent him from campaigning for the Lok Sabha elections.
Since his arrest, his wife Sunita Kejriwal has been reading out his messages. BJP has demanded that Kejriwal resign as the Delhi chief minister. However, per AAP, he has passed several orders from inside the jail.
